header-logo header-logo

23 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit: deal or no deal?

Next steps might rebalance UK constitution & its workings forever

Innovation and some constitutional acrobatics could be required if Parliament takes over control of the Brexit process, according to a senior lawyer and Brexit commentator.

MPs have tabled a series of amendments ahead of the vote next week, when Prime Minister Theresa May will renew attempts to persuade the House of Commons to back her withdrawal deal.

They include Labour’s Yvette Cooper and Conservative Nick Boles’s request for a one-day debate on a bill requiring the Prime Minister to seek an Art 50 extension until the end of the year if MPs have not approved a Brexit deal by 26 February.

Former Attorney General Dominic Grieve, meanwhile, has asked for six days of Brexit debate with backbenchers rather than the government in control.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe & NLJ consultant editor, says: ‘Parliament is not particularly structured to draft legislation or to drive it through the process, which needs a governmental dynamic.

‘This is not its constitutional role, and it is difficult to see how this will work without innovative machinations of the speaker, whose own role as a neutral may also present constitutional problems.

‘Further, constitutionally the government retains the whip hand, reinforced by Parliament’s own legislation.’

Greene says such moves would ‘turn the legislative process on its head’.

He concludes: ‘Rejection of the prime minister’s proposals has, as she rightly said, put us into uncharted territory constitutionally. Where we go from here might rebalance the UK constitution and its workings forever.’

Meanwhile, the Bar has published its latest Brexit Paper, this time examining how environmental laws will be enforced after Brexit. It is authored by Bar Council EU Law Committee member Celina Colquhoun.

Currently, EU institutions can fine the UK for breaches of EU pollution limits or refer the UK to the European Court of Justice, forcing the government to take action. Post-Brexit, Colquhoun says, the new watchdog proposed by DEFRA, the Office of Environmental Protection, will have far less power.

Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll