header-logo header-logo

06 March 2019 / David Greene
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , Profession
printer mail-detail

Brexit: counting down the clock

With less than a month until Exit Day, David Greene examines the most & least likely outcomes on the UK’s horizon

As we head swiftly towards the door, it has become rather trite to say the outcome grows increasingly uncertain; no deal, the May deal, a softer Brexit, a second referendum. Other than the first option, all may be combined with a delayed exit. The profession has made it clear that it sees substantial risk in a no-deal Brexit.

Everything is difficult to predict because majorities for each option in Parliament are wafer thin, but the betting man in me proffers an order of outcome in which the range is from the least likely to the most likely:

  • No deal There seems to be an absolute majority in Parliament against a no-deal, although it would require primary legislation to force the government’s hand;
  • A second referendum While the Labour Party has indicated, albeit somewhat half-heartedly, this is now their preferred option, another referendum is very difficult to put into effect practically and politically, not least because of the impending European
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll