header-logo header-logo

07 April 2016 / Catherine Dixon
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit brainstorming

Catherine Dixon underlines the importance of making an informed decision over Britain’s future with the EU

Let me start by saying that the Law Society does not have a position on Brexit—either in or out.

Solicitors—like everyone else—will make their minds up on Brexit based on a whole range of considerations, including business but also taking into account political views and those of family and friends.

In 2015 the Law Society decided that part of our role as the professional body for solicitors was to take a look at what the impact might be for the legal sector if the British people decide on 23 June to remain within the EU or to leave it.

Short term v long term implications

In the short term some solicitors could enjoy their widely trailed “Brexit bonanza” as agreements are unpicked, contracts altered, new domestic rules written and the legal complexities of any changed relationship with the EU unravelled.

However, based on an independent assessment we commissioned by Oxford Economics, in the longer term a UK withdrawal is likely to disadvantage the legal services sector disproportionately when compared to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll