header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit and the justice system

Question marks over lingua franca status of English law post-Brexit

Brexit is causing a loss of confidence in the use of English law in contracts, the Justice Committee has heard.

Giving evidence this week, Clifford Chance partner Kate Gibbons said English law has always been the ‘lingua franca’ for contracts but ‘now people are taking a breath and asking if it remains appropriate’.

‘There is no torrent of concern but a slight loosening of the tooth in the mouth. It’s a question that’s being asked, but the longer we go without a clear resolution, the more there is a tendency to wiggle that tooth.’

She said financial clients need more certainty, for example, there is a risk that clients dealing in derivatives may have ongoing contractual obligations that they can’t comply with after Brexit.

Bar Chair Andrew Walker QC said: ‘The Netherlands, France, Germany and Belgium are all setting up commercial courts in the English language because of the opportunity that they see in Brexit, while the Irish are saying “come to Dublin”.’ He said some barristers have already taken steps to become members of the Irish Bar because they understand they risk losing their EU law practices if they do not.

Gibbons added: ‘If we could say straight away there is mutual enforcement of judgments and recognition of jurisdiction then we would get rid of most of [the concerns].’

Simon Davis, Law Society vice-president, said: ‘The choice of law was already fiercely competitive, and this has given the competition an extra stick to beat us with’. Davis said about 1,000 solicitors have requalified in Ireland, while Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Eversheds Sutherland are now the biggest firms in Dublin.

For family law, the panel agreed there are fallbacks if there is no deal but said these were not as good as the existing system and would cost more, take longer and add to the burden on families. They agreed with Justice Committee Chair Bob Neill that there could be a return to parallel proceedings in divorce cases.

Also giving evidence this week, Justice Minister Lucy Frazer QC said she recognised there is a gap on provision for divorce, adding: ‘The plan is to get a deal as close as possible to what we’ve got.’

Issue: 7814 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll