header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Robert Moss
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Breaking point

Leases: to break or not to break, asks Robert Moss

As Max Bialystock said in The Producers: “I picked the wrong play, the wrong director, the wrong cast. Where did I go right?”

No doubt the tenant in the recent decision of M W Trustees Limited and Others v Telular Corporation [2011] DEWHC104 must have had similar thoughts in relation to its successful attempt to break its lease.

The facts

The case concerned a lease which contained a typical tenant break which required the tenant to give notice to the landlord in writing, and specifically stated that notice would only be valid if served by special delivery or by hand.
In October 2008 the freehold interest in the property had been transferred by company S to the claimants, M W Trustees Limited, as trustees of the pension of Mr and Mrs Pozel, the other parties to the action. The new landlord appointed Mattioli Woods plc as managing agents and it informed the tenant of the change of landlord.

In August 2009 an officer of the tenant company (who was unaware of the change of ownership)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll