header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Robert Moss
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Breaking point

Leases: to break or not to break, asks Robert Moss

As Max Bialystock said in The Producers: “I picked the wrong play, the wrong director, the wrong cast. Where did I go right?”

No doubt the tenant in the recent decision of M W Trustees Limited and Others v Telular Corporation [2011] DEWHC104 must have had similar thoughts in relation to its successful attempt to break its lease.

The facts

The case concerned a lease which contained a typical tenant break which required the tenant to give notice to the landlord in writing, and specifically stated that notice would only be valid if served by special delivery or by hand.
In October 2008 the freehold interest in the property had been transferred by company S to the claimants, M W Trustees Limited, as trustees of the pension of Mr and Mrs Pozel, the other parties to the action. The new landlord appointed Mattioli Woods plc as managing agents and it informed the tenant of the change of landlord.

In August 2009 an officer of the tenant company (who was unaware of the change of ownership)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll