header-logo header-logo

06 July 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , Emma Humphreys
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Breaking the code

Emma Humphreys & Malcolm Dowden dissect the recent Law Commission e-comms code consultation

The Law Commission’s consultation paper based on its initial review of the electronic communications code (the code) makes some substantive proposals for change, but also raises several questions and calls for information from practitioners.

Actual reform remains a distant prospect. There is no realistic chance of change until at least 2015. Consequently, while practitioners ought to take the opportunity to contribute to the reform process, the paper has a more immediate practical use since it isolates points on which the code is unclear and possibly unworkable in its current form. Consequently, it provides practitioners with a crisp and direct means to navigate through the complex drafting and often questionable logic of the code when advising clients on current matters.

Private enterprise, public benefit

The Commission considers that a court order made under the code to dispense with the need for agreement to the installation of electronic communications apparatus must engage human rights issues: specifically, protection of private property under Art 1 of the First Protocol to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll