header-logo header-logo

25 January 2007
Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A brave new world at the Home Office?

News

Speculation is mounting that the Home Office is to be split into separate justice and public protection functions.

Home Secretary John Reid, who declared the department “not fit for purpose” on taking office in May last year, has dropped several hints that radical change may be necessary. Reid’s reform plans are due to be debated by the cabinet next month, according to the BBC, and they are already provoking discussion among crime and immigration law specialists.
Paul Cavadino, chief executive of crime reduction charity Nacro, say there could be advantages in creating a separate justice ministry. “A Ministry of Justice could concentrate on reducing crime and running an effective penal system without being diverted by constant crises in security and immigration policy.

“There would also be an advantage in having two separate departmental budgets. For example, if the government suddenly decided to switch more resources into the immigration detention system, this would no longer put other parts of the Home Office budget at immediate risk,” he says.
Immigration barrister Doron Blum, of 1 Pump Court Chambers, says: “The Home Office is under-resourced, under-staffed and over-stretched. My hope for these plans would be that it means more resources.

“A few months ago, there were no presenting officers representing the Home Office in a quarter of cases at the [immigration] tribunal. People were leaving because of low pay. If it means there will be more resources and people will stay on so that presenting officers become more experienced then that is good. “My fear is it could lead to more bureaucracy. Things get lost in the Home Office as it is.”

However, the Home Office denies that plans to split the department into its separate functions exist. A spokesperson says: “No such proposal has been made. The Home Secretary has put in place a plan for the reform and transformation of the Home Office, and that is composed of three separate reviews into the Immigration and Nationality Directorate, the criminal justice system and security capabilities.”

Issue: 7257 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll