header-logo header-logo

15 November 2009
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Branding legal services

Consumers of legal services prefer well-known brand names, such as banks and retailers, yet six out of 10 cannot name a single law firm.

Consumers of legal services prefer well-known brand names, such as banks and retailers, yet six out of 10 cannot name a single law firm.

Magic circle and large national or regional law practices are the best known among consumers, according to a survey of more than 2,000 people published this week by the national network of law firms, the Legal Alliance.
More than half of participants said they would go to a well known brand for legal services.

On the plus side for law firms, some 88% of those surveyed said the ability to access legal services locally was important. Roughly the same number said they would be less likely to use a remote or call centre based legal service.

Jon Bostock, chief executive of the Legal Alliance, says: “Consumers will access legal services through brands in the future, as is the case in most other markets, but that’s not to say solicitors are redundant in the current climate.

“Within the first month since launching our first brand partnerships we are already generating hundreds of legal work opportunities and more will follow as more brand partners continue to join us. Brands represent the future of the legal service market and distributors must recognise the benefits of a changing landscape.”

Nick Jervis, director of legal marketing firm, Samson Consulting, says: “It is important for firms to keep up contact with past clients and, with all the software available these days, there is no excuse for not doing so.”
 

Issue: 7393 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll