header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Brent Mcdonald
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Bouncing & bouldering

Brent McDonald discusses recent cases involving negligence and statutory duty

In Poppleton v Trustees of the Portsmouth Youth Activities Committee [2008] EWCA Civ 646, [2008] All ER (D) 150 (Jun) the Court of Appeal was asked to consider a case where the claimant, Mr Poppleton, had suffered an injury at the defendant's activity centre.

Poppleton attended an activity centre on 12 February 2002 with a group of friends to engage in an activity known as “bouldering”. Bouldering is a low level simulated rock climbing activity.

The claimant was a relatively inexperienced climber although he had used this particular bouldering wall three or four times before. The defendant did not show him any rules or ask him to sign a disclaimer notice, nor did it give him any instruction as to the risks of this activity. It made no enquiries as to his ability as a climber. The experts agreed that the rules prohibiting jumping off the walls and climbing on top of the structure should have been more prominently displayed.

Having seen a friend leap from one of the walls, grab hold of a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll