header-logo header-logo

Boosting equality should be Bar priority

04 September 2024
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Barristers would have a professional obligation to advance equality, diversity & inclusion (EDI), under proposals to amend regulations

The change to the wording of Core Duty 8 would replace the current duty not to discriminate unlawfully.

A Bar Standards Board (BSB) ‘Consultation on the proposed amendments to the equality rule’, launched this week, states: ‘In order to achieve the culture change needed, we believe the duty needs to go further.

‘We believe it should be a core expectation of all practising barristers that they demonstrate an appropriate commitment, through their practice, to equality, diversity and inclusion.’

The BSB also proposes moving to outcomes-based regulation of equality rules.

Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘While much progress has been made—thanks to the work of individuals, chambers, Inns, Specialist Bar Associations and others—there is clearly much more to be done.

‘Much of the progress made on EDI in chambers is thanks to the voluntary work of EDOs [equality and diversity officers] and we are keen to make sure that any regulatory changes do not undermine that work. Radical change is certainly disruptive and may have unintended detrimental consequences.  

‘On the proposals to move to outcomes-based regulation, we have previously raised concerns that this could pose significant challenges for the Bar and may be ineffective.’

The BSB previously proposed outcomes-based regulation in October 2023, ‘Consultation on the regulation of barristers in chambers’. Responding in February, the Bar Council warned this would pose ‘significant challenges’.

It said: ‘Barristers, generally, work long hours in an intellectually demanding job. Reading, considering and understanding outcomes, then devising ways to achieve them, is not a task that they have time or incentive to carry out.’

Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll