header-logo header-logo

17 February 2017 / Michelle Barron
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Boosting costs recovery

Michelle Barron highlights the top eight costs mistakes law firms make, with suggested remedies

The legal sector is unique in the complexity and contentious nature of the calculation and recovery of costs. It is routine for considerable time, effort and frequently litigation to be required to recover costs.

As an experienced costs lawyer, I see common and recurring mistakes, many of which can hamper costs recovery and lead to significant write-offs and adverse costs orders. The impact on cash flow, profitability and resilience in a difficult sector can be immense. But many mistakes are not technical in nature, and can be avoided with minimal time and effort.

1. Delay

Healthy cash flow is the lifeblood of any successful business. The process of costs recovery must be started at the earliest opportunity.

Costs lawyers regularly receive files where there is an entitlement to costs but no action has been taken to recover them. In some cases, several years may have elapsed since the entitlement arose. The reasons for delay vary, but a systematic failure to manage lock-up is usually central.

Rigorously followed credit control procedures are the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll