header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 January 2022 / David Greene
Issue: 7964 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice
printer mail-detail

Book review: The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
"The message of Breyer is that the Supreme Court, like democracy, relies on consensus and a recognition from all institutions of faithfulness to that consensus"

Author: Stephen Breyer

Publisher: Harvard University Press

ISBN: 978067426936

RRP: £15.95

Stephen Breyer is an Associate US Supreme Court Justice. His short book The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics is the product of his lecture that should have been given at the Scalia Lecture 2021 but the pandemic intervened. And a super little book it is dealing with the relationship between the Supreme Court and the executive; highly apposite here and in the US.

Why generally (but not always) do people and governments accept a court decision as conclusive without significant protest? Cicero wrote of the nature of acquiescence and obedience to state power arising from three factors—punishment, rewards and belief that the state is a just one. Breyer’s thesis is that the Supreme Court relies on the latter in its dealings with government. In the US constitution there is a symbiotic relationship, government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll