header-logo header-logo

29 October 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Book review: How Judges Decide Cases: Reading, Writing and Analysing Judgments (Second Edition)

“I would commend it to every advocate whose performance should be allied to their assessment of what is going in the judge’s head”

  • Author: Andrew Goodman
  • Publisher: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing
  • ISBN: 9780854902453
  • Pages: 268
  • RRP: £45

Like some legal columns, judgments go largely unread. When you think of the erudition, labour, love and ingenuity that goes into them (and the occasional illustration in patent cases, although the practice seems to be spreading to the Queen’s Bench Division, and we won’t mention the embedded coded message, eh?), that is a crying shame. Of course, the parties and their legal representatives will have an interest, doubtlessly starting at the final paragraph of a written job and working backwards. So will the media, if there’s an accompanying summary as in the Supreme Court, and will proceed to corrupt the decision and its implications for the general public unless there is an expert legal correspondent in the way.

Lessons from dirty dogs

Andrew Goodman’s fascinating book acknowledges the wastage as it delves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll