header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Julian Sidoli Del Ceno
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

A bitter harvest?

Julian Sidoli del Ceno considers the future of ongoing guarantees for landlords

The Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (LT(C)A 1995) set out to limit a tenant’s liabilities to the landlord following assignation. Hitherto, a former tenant might find themselves liable for a subsequent tenant’s default even though they may have parted company from any interest in the property in question many years before and there may have been a number of subsequent assignations over which they themselves would have had no control or even knowledge. The concern over this unjust state of affairs stretches back many decades and was brought to the fore in the law commission’s report Landlord and Tenant Law: Privity of Contract and Estate (Law Com no 174 1988) which paved the way for the subsequent 1995 Act.

Baroness Hale, in a well-known statement said: “The mischief at which the commission’s recommendations were aimed was the continuation of a liability long after the parties had parted with their interests in the property to which it was related.” (Avonridge Property Co Ltd v Mashru [2005] UKHL 70, [2006]

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll