header-logo header-logo

08 July 2022 / Laura Rees
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Bill of costs: appeal dismissed!

87142
Fee earners could risk failing to have their bills assessed if the right fee earner information is not provided, says Laura Rees
  • Court of Appeal judgment in AKC v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWCA Civ 630 is a blow to firms who use a team approach and have multiple fee earners conducting a case.
  • Bills must be drafted with all the requisite fee earner information.
  • Those that draft bills must have a deep understanding of the functionality of how a bill works, as leaving codes/details blank may mean that the summary sheets within the bill are unreliable.

Lord Justice Newey provided the leading judgment in AKC v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWCA Civ 630, dismissing the claimant’s appeal and concluding that the claimant must provide more information in relation to the fee earner’s SCCO grade and status in both paper and electronic bills.

The claimant made a clinical negligence claim against the defendant in respect of a cerebral arteriovenous malformation in 2012. Liability costs were agreed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll