header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Divorce , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Big money divorce case heads to Europe

Alan Miller—who last year was ordered by the House of Lords to hand over £5m to his childless wife of three years—is taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

Miller’s lawyers will argue that the level of discretion available to the courts has meant the law has become so confused and unpredictable that the payout to his ex- wife breached his right to property under Art 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights.

However, James Freeman, solicitor with Speechly Bircham, says the ECtHR may not be receptive to this argument.
“If the ECtHR is to entertain Alan Miller’s claim, one conjectures that the arguments put to it will have to be along the lines that the current English divorce law is either so swingeing or so unpredictable that it amounts in its essence to a breach of his right to peaceable enjoyment of his possessions,” he says.

He adds that the English courts have not proved receptive to such line of reasoning in the past: only last month John Charman tried and failed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll