header-logo header-logo

BHP held liable for Fundão dam disaster

Australia-headquartered mining giant BHP has been held strictly liable as ‘polluters’ for the Fundão dam disaster in Brazil, in one of the largest group actions ever brought in the English courts

More than 600,000 claimants brought the case, Município de Mariana v BHP Group [2025] EWHC 3001 (TCC), handed down last week. The 2015 dam collapse and flow of liquified iron ore tailings killed 19 people and caused widespread devastation.

Ben Wolfe, partner at Grosvenor Law, said the decision was ‘a stark reminder that parent companies and investors can be found liable in England for events and environmental failures that occur on overseas projects—even where assets are operated through joint ventures and local subsidiaries.

‘The court’s findings on foreseeability and duties of oversight significantly expand the potential exposure of large multinational groups.’

Lucy Blake, partner at Jenner & Block, said: ‘Companies are increasingly under pressure to take responsibility, not just for their own operations but also for third parties in respect of human rights and environmental harms.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll