header-logo header-logo

27 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Beware the ‘predatory marriage’

18317
The concept of ‘predatory marriage’ may mean little to English lawyers and probate practitioners, but it is a phenomenon that can have serious and permanent testamentary effects, according to James McKean, New Square Chambers, and Shoosmiths solicitors Andrew Bishop and Hollie Richardson

In a revealing article for NLJ, the trio explain how individuals without mental capacity can be ensnared in a predatory marriage, both in this jurisdiction and abroad. These marriages are voidable not void and therefore cannot be challenged after death. Beneficiaries under previous wills are disinherited, largely without recourse. Consequently, practitioners should consider capacity to marry as they consider capacity to make a will. They outline recent caselaw and suggest practical points for lawyers to consider.

The article’s authors are campaigning on the issue, and seeking to revive attempts to reform the law―a previous private member’s bill ‘withered on the parliamentary vine’. Should readers wish to support or find out more, please email: Andrew.Bishop@shoosmiths.co.uk. The NLJ article can be found at: https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/the-predatory-marriage-trap.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll