header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011 / Vanessa Van Breda , Mark Surguy
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Between a rock and a hard place

Vanessa van Breda & Mark Surguy approach the conflicting forces of duty & disclosure

A solicitor has duties to his client and the court during the disclosure process. Increasingly a tension occurs between the two, especially as in-house counsel seeks to control more of the process to manage costs This article explores the tensions in the light of Common Market Commercial Services AVV (CMCS) v Taylor and Taylor v Stoutt, CMCS and Jakober [2011] EWHC 324 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 269 (Feb) (CMCS).

Brief facts of CMCS

The proceedings arose out of a dispute over the beneficial ownership of a property following a divorce. The property was owned by a Netherlands Antilles bearer share company owned or controlled by a Swiss national living in Geneva.

The company sought possession of the property and the wife sought a transfer to herself on the basis that the funds to acquire the property came from the husband. She sought disclosure from the Swiss national in order to prove the origin of the funds. The company and the Swiss

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll