header-logo header-logo

02 October 2015 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7670 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

​Best laid plans?

web_acton

Stephen Acton examines developers’ delays in completion of off-plan purchases

Purchasing off-plan in a new development can raise all sorts of problems for the purchaser. Not the least of them concerns the typical lack of certainty as regards the developer’s obligation to complete by any given time, and the consequences of that to the purchaser.

In a one-off development for one specific client, there might well be a contractual completion date, or at least a target date, with contractual penalties for missing that date. Developers do not often, if at all, offer that sort of arrangement in respect of a multiple development, whether commercial or residential. Indeed, in some cases the contract will specify an anticipated legal completion date, but permit the developer to extend that date when delays occur, in particular building delays, for specified reasons.

In other cases, however, the date for completion will be completely open-ended, simply being triggered by the developer’s notice to complete. At most, this might be tied to the completion of the construction, whether issue of a formal certificate of practical completion or otherwise, so that the developer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll