header-logo header-logo

29 September 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Bereavement reform for cohabitees

Cohabiting partners will be entitled to a bereavement payment along with married partners next week, following a change to the Fatal Accident Act
Under the 1976 Act, a statutory payment of £12,980 is made where a spouse dies as a result of negligence. From 6 October, the Act extends its scope to include a ‘cohabiting partner of the deceased living in the same household immediately before the date of death, and… for at least two years before that date’.

The reform is the result of the landmark case of Smith v Lancashire teaching Hospitals [2017] EWCA Civ 1916, when Jacqueline Smith, represented by Slater & Gordon, was told she didn’t qualify for a payment because she was not married to her partner of 16 years.

The Court of Appeal made a declaration of incompatibility on the basis the category restriction contravened Art 14 in conjunction with Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll