header-logo header-logo

28 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bellwether finds confidence & optimism

Small and medium law firms are bullish about the future but, paradoxically, far less confident about their clients’ prospects, according to this year’s Bellwether Report
The annual update, commissioned by LexisNexis and published this week, found 84% of firms are stable or growing and more than two-thirds of firms are planning for growth in the next five years―yet 38% view COVID-19 as a critical threat for their clients. As the report states, ‘there is no path to recovery without a buoyant consumer and commercial market’.


The findings indicate law firms may be in a healthier state than many thought―a Law Society survey published on 1 May, by comparison, found 71% of high street firms believed they might have to close their business in the next six months.  

‘This is a starkly different picture compared to other surveys of the legal market,’ the report states.

‘Our fieldwork, conducted a month or two later, may reflect the impact of the government’s rescue plan in shoring up legal firm’s finances.’

Nearly eight in ten firms are making use of a rescue initiative, such as the furlough scheme. Surprisingly, only 4% of firms needed to make any redundancies and only 17% believe they may need to when the furlough scheme ends in October.

The option of working from home is likely to continue when the pandemic ends. Of those surveyed, half thought their firm was likely to permanently change its policy, and 53% said they would like to work from home full- or part-time in the future. However, there have also been drawbacks, with the biggest issue, cited by 71% of respondents, being the lack of face-to-face contact with clients.

Chris O’Connor, Small Law lead at LexisNexis, said: ‘The COVID-19 crisis has been tough for the legal sector, but there are positive signs in the darkness. 

‘With high growth predictions, improved wellbeing and an uptake of new technologies―law firms have a lot to look forward to. But, with commercial and consumer market-places stuttering―much rides on a sharp recovery.’

The report, ‘OMG or BAU? Bellwether 2020: COVID-19 and the legal industry’, can be downloaded from: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/Bellwether2020.

 

Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll