header-logo header-logo

28 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Beer war comes to a head

Two drinks giants must share a trademark in the UK, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled

Anheuser-Busch, which makes US Budweiser beer, has lost its attempt to legally force its Czech rival Budějovický Budvar to stop using the “Budweiser” name in the UK.

In 2000, both companies were given permission by the Court of Appeal to simultaneously register the trademark as they had a long-standing and honest history of co-existence in the UK market.

That changed in 2005, when Anheuser-Busch started legal action to invalidate their rival’s use of the trademark on the grounds that their 1976 registration predates Budvar’s 1989 application. The Court of Appeal sought clarification from the ECJ, which last week ruled in Budvar’s favour.

Mark Blair, partner at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, which acted for Budvar, said: “The two brands have co-existed in the UK for decades, differing in taste, price, and get up.

“The identical nature of the ‘Budweiser’ marks is an honest, historical co-incidence, and causes no significant confusion amongst UK consumers.This is effectively a very strong endorsement from the [ECJ] of Budvar’s right to the ‘Budweiser’ name in the UK, and of the underlying principles of trademark law in general—it sends a clear message that you cannot simply cancel a trademark that has been used for 30 plus years in good faith.”

Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll