header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Battle of the Chattels

An ancillary relief consent order provides for equal division by agreement of the parties’ chattels...

An ancillary relief consent order provides for equal division by agreement of the parties’ chattels and determination by the court in default of agreement. The parties cannot agree. On determination, will s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 factors be engaged or are they displaced by the agreement for equality?

The section 25 factors will be engaged and that is why such an order is so unsatisfactory as it purports to hive off one element of the application whereas the court’s duty relates to the parties’ affairs generally. Therefore, it is not inconceivable that the district judge will refuse to approve such an order which leaves chattel sharing unresolved. An arguably ingenious practice adopted by one court was to direct a Scott Schedule requiring each item to be listed with the parties inserting the monetary value for it for which they contended on the basis that the item went to the party giving the higher figure but that party had to account to the other for their valuation figure.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll