header-logo header-logo

10 April 2015 / Phillip Patterson
Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

Battle of Britain

Phillip Patterson provides a commentary on the Al Sweady Inquiry

Shortly before Christmas, the 1,250 page report by Sir Thayne Forbes following the £31m Al Sweady Public Inquiry was laid before Parliament. The Inquiry considered some of the most serious allegations levelled at British troops since the Second World War. Although the report identified some instances of ill-treatment within the evidence, it will be viewed as a powerful and vociferous exoneration of the military.  

Battle of Danny Boy

The events with which the inquiry was concerned began on 14 May 2004 with what the military named, the Battle of Danny Boy. In the eyes of the military, the Battle of Danny Boy represented a great success, in which infantry soldiers from the Princess of Wales’ Royal Regiment and the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders overcame a large, co-ordinated and deadly ambush by the Mahdi Army on their patrol. On the military account of events, 28 armed insurgents were killed in the battle and nine armed insurgents were taken prisoner and detained in British-run facilities until September of that year. The military asserted that 20 of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll