header-logo header-logo

26 May 2020
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barristers want safety in court

COVID-19 cleanliness concerns
Nearly 85% of criminal barristers are concerned about the health risks to them or their households of returning to court under current circumstances, a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey, has found (see ‘The Impact of COVID-19’ (https://bit.ly/2yyPuLo).

However, 80% agreed the risk to them and their family could be reduced to an acceptable level if all the safety measures mentioned in the survey were implemented.

These measures, which were all supported by the vast majority of respondents, included deep cleaning of courts between trials, as well as the supply of disinfectant, hand sanitiser, paper towels and adequate washing facilities, and the supply of plastic or glass screens so they could safely confer with defendants and witnesses. More than 90% thought it either essential or desirable that HM Courts and Tribunals supply PPE (personal protective equipment) in line with any government guidance to counsel, defendants, witnesses and court staff.

The results of the survey, completed by 1,878 barristers, were published last week.

CBA chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘My recollection of the court estate was of dirty courts, broken seats, waste bins left overflowing, unkempt poorly cleaned and frankly unloved neglected buildings.’ However, a clean-up operation has taken place. Goodwin said she has visited courts including Newcastle, Leeds, Old Bailey, Cardiff, Bristol, Warwick and Minshull street, and ‘from the custody suite arrangements for conference, to the marking out with gaffer tape, the buildings look and feel very different’.

Meanwhile, jury trials were listed to start in Reading, Warwick and Winchester Crown Courts this week. Jury trials have also been taking place at Manchester Minshull Street, Bristol, Cardiff and The Old Bailey.

Mr Justice Edis, chair of the Jury Trials Working Group, which is looking for safe ways for jury trials to proceed, said: ‘The feedback received from participants, including court staff, jurors, witnesses and legal professionals, has been positive.’

Issue: 7888 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll