header-logo header-logo

26 May 2020
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barristers want safety in court

COVID-19 cleanliness concerns
Nearly 85% of criminal barristers are concerned about the health risks to them or their households of returning to court under current circumstances, a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey, has found (see ‘The Impact of COVID-19’ (https://bit.ly/2yyPuLo).

However, 80% agreed the risk to them and their family could be reduced to an acceptable level if all the safety measures mentioned in the survey were implemented.

These measures, which were all supported by the vast majority of respondents, included deep cleaning of courts between trials, as well as the supply of disinfectant, hand sanitiser, paper towels and adequate washing facilities, and the supply of plastic or glass screens so they could safely confer with defendants and witnesses. More than 90% thought it either essential or desirable that HM Courts and Tribunals supply PPE (personal protective equipment) in line with any government guidance to counsel, defendants, witnesses and court staff.

The results of the survey, completed by 1,878 barristers, were published last week.

CBA chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘My recollection of the court estate was of dirty courts, broken seats, waste bins left overflowing, unkempt poorly cleaned and frankly unloved neglected buildings.’ However, a clean-up operation has taken place. Goodwin said she has visited courts including Newcastle, Leeds, Old Bailey, Cardiff, Bristol, Warwick and Minshull street, and ‘from the custody suite arrangements for conference, to the marking out with gaffer tape, the buildings look and feel very different’.

Meanwhile, jury trials were listed to start in Reading, Warwick and Winchester Crown Courts this week. Jury trials have also been taking place at Manchester Minshull Street, Bristol, Cardiff and The Old Bailey.

Mr Justice Edis, chair of the Jury Trials Working Group, which is looking for safe ways for jury trials to proceed, said: ‘The feedback received from participants, including court staff, jurors, witnesses and legal professionals, has been positive.’

Issue: 7888 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll