header-logo header-logo

27 May 2019
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers vote on walkout

Criminal barristers are voting on whether to stage a ‘whole profession walkout’ on 1 July over prosecution and defence fees

After 1 July, barristers would operate an indefinite no returns policy for both defence and prosecution work. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA), which balloted its members last week on the proposed action, also promised ‘action will escalate in due course’ if there is no progress on barristers’ demands.

Barristers have until 5pm on 4 June to voice their opinion. However, some 95% of criminal barristers surveyed by the CBA last month said they were prepared to take direct action.

In a message to members, CBA chair Chris Henley QC and vice-chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘We are paid less than the minimum wage in case after case, whether prosecuting or defending.

‘We work late into the night, and through weekends as a matter of routine. We gift huge numbers of hours, worth ten, twenty, thirty thousand pounds a year, if not more, to keep trials on track, and on time.

‘This is not proposed action to secure a complete overhaul of either Crown Prosecution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll