header-logo header-logo

17 June 2022
Issue: 7983 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers could boycott courts

Criminal barristers are voting on whether to drastically escalate their ‘no returns’ protest action by executing court walkouts

Criminal barristers are voting on whether to drastically escalate their ‘no returns’ protest action by executing court walkouts.

The option, which could force the criminal courts to stop proceedings taking place before the end of June, is one of three choices put before practitioners this week in a second Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot. The others are refusing to take on any new cases under the advocates graduated fee scheme as well as refusing returns, or ending the protest.

The proposed ‘days of action’ walkouts would escalate, taking place on 27- 28 June in the first week, 4-6 July in the second week, 11-14 July in the third week, 18-22 July in the fourth week and the whole of the week commencing 25 July.

The barristers would refuse to work again for the whole week commencing 1 August, then they would down tools for whole weeks at a time on alternating weeks ‘with no end date… subject to the response from government’.

The ballot will close at midnight on 19 June.

The ’no returns’ protest has been ongoing since April, over low legal aid fees for defence barristers. Last week, the CBA held consultations with members by Zoom to gauge their views. CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said ‘the overwhelming feedback was… there should be a swift and substantial escalation in the action we are taking’.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has proposed a 15% increase, the minimum recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review, to be introduced in October. The CBA say members would not benefit from the increase until at least late 2023. It is asking for a 25% increase and wants the government to ‘at least’ implement the minimum 15% increase with immediate effect.

Sidhu said a quarter of criminal barristers have left their practice in the past five years and 567 trials were postponed last year for want of an available prosecution or defence barrister.

Issue: 7983 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll