header-logo header-logo

12 January 2022
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers consult on protest action

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) is polling its members on taking direct action or ‘as a minimum’ adopting a no returns policy should ministers fail to commit to increase fees
Practitioners have been asked to respond to a seven-day survey launched this week, on what increase they deem acceptable and what protest action they are prepared to take.

In December, Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid recommended at least £135m extra per year be added to the budget to keep the criminal justice system functioning effectively. This would increase funding for solicitors and barristers by 15% above present levels, amounting to an extra £35m in fees.

The Ministry of Justice said it would issue its full response to the review and consultation by the end of March 2022.

In his ‘Monday Message’ this week, however, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC says he ‘made it abundantly clear’ at a meeting on 15 December with the under-secretary of state for justice that it would be ‘utterly unacceptable for the Criminal Bar to wait another 15 weeks to hear the government’s verdict’ with any ensuing consultation meaning the outcome would not be known until the end of June.

Sidhu described the proposed ‘modest increase’ as ‘an insultingly small improvement in annual incomes’ that would do nothing to discourage hundreds more colleagues from leaving legal aid work.

The CBA survey asks whether the respondent agrees: it is unreasonable for the government to delay its response until the end of March; that unless the government undertakes to complete both its response and consultation by the end of March, criminal barristers should ‘take action to include, as a minimum, no returns’; an increase of £35m (15%) is insufficient; and criminal barristers should take action unless the government commits to a ‘substantial increase’.

Issue: 7962 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll