header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barrister psychometric tests to end

Divided opinions over fairness to students

The Bar Course Aptitude Test (BCAT) is to be scrapped from 31 July because it ‘no longer… serves a useful purpose’, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed.

However, the Bar Council reiterated its concerns that scrapping the BCAT will lead to increasing numbers of students paying to complete courses with little or no prospect of achieving a successful career at the Bar.

The Legal Services Board has approved the BSB’s application to end the Test, which costs students £150 and was introduced as a prerequisite for vocational training as a barrister in 2013 when high numbers of students were failing the Bar course. The Test was intended to filter students for aptitude. It is a computerised 55-minute test with 60 multiple choice questions, based on a Watson-Glaser psychometric test of critical thinking and understanding of arguments, identifying different perspectives, and distinguishing facts from opinions and assumptions.

BSB director general, Mark Neale, said: ‘Bar training providers must comply fully with the requirements of the Authorisation Framework when selecting their students, and that includes their obligations to maintain high standards and to promote accessibility.

‘We shall continue to monitor providers carefully to ensure that their own selection of students is fair and rigorous.’

However, Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The problem of too many students wasting money embarking on courses they will struggle to pass is on the rise again.

‘We fully support the aims of making sure the Bar is accessible to people from all backgrounds and so we are disappointed that the decision to scrap the BCAT has been made without putting robust alternative provisions in place.’

In its response to the September 2021 BSB consultation on the future of the BCAT, the Bar Council highlighted the ‘reasonably good correlation between BCAT mark and degree of success on the BPTC’.

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll