header-logo header-logo

22 March 2017
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barrister fined over data protection breach

A barrister has been fined £1,000 for failing to keep clients’ sensitive information secure, after her husband updated software on the couple’s home computer.

The husband’s action resulted in information belonging to 250 people, including vulnerable adults and children involved in Family Court and Court of Protection proceedings, being uploaded to the internet. Some 725 unencrypted documents, which were created and stored on the computer, were temporarily uploaded to an internet directory as a back-up during the software upgrade.

According to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the information was visible to an internet search engine and some of the documents could be easily accessed through a simple search.

Steve Eckersley, head of enforcement at the ICO, said: “This barrister, for no good reason, overlooked her responsibility to protect her clients’ confidential and highly sensitive information.

“It is hard to imagine the distress this could have caused to the people involved—even if the worst never happened, this barrister exposed her clients to unnecessary worry and upset.” 

Issue: 7739 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll