header-logo header-logo

16 November 2022
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar pleads: no more budget cuts

Budget cuts, LASPO’s ten-year legacy and recent political decisions have devastated access to justice, according to a major piece of research by the Bar Council.

The report, ‘Access denied: the state of the justice system in England and Wales in 2022’, paints a worrying picture in which 239 court closures since 2010 have left low-income clients unable to afford travel fares to their hearings, while many remaining courts are in crumbling buildings with leaks and infestations and even without basic facilities.

Meanwhile, LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) ‘significantly’ restricted access to civil legal aid and the subsequent increase in litigants in person has resulted in cases taking longer and costing more. The Bar Council report highlights that litigants have had a ‘mixed experience’ of remote justice, which requires further investigation.

It also found barristers are diversifying away from legal aid work due to workload pressures and poor remuneration, further reducing the capacity of the system. Moreover, political attacks on the rule of law and anti-lawyer rhetoric are undermining confidence in the justice system.

The report combines data from the Bar Council’s Access to Justice dashboard with testimony from barristers and other practitioners who took part in a Justice Week workshop earlier this year.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘Through the evidence presented in this report, we make a special pleading that access to justice is properly recognised as a necessary pillar of a fair and just society.

‘The improved funding that has been available in the last two years cannot now be reversed without causing irrevocable damage to this vital public service. The consequences of cuts are not only a failing system, but one that ultimately costs more—both in terms of money and in human terms. The government must commit to long-term planning and resourcing of the system.’

Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll