header-logo header-logo

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Bar misconduct threshold lowered

Barristers accused of professional misconduct will be prosecuted with the civil standard of proof in future, following a change to their professional code.

The new edition of the Bar Standards Board (BSB) Handbook, published this week, adopts the lower threshold of balance of probabilities or ‘more likely than not’ for conduct that occurs from 1 April 2019. Previously, alleged breaches of the Bar’s code of conduct have been judged according to the criminal standard of proof, beyond reasonable doubt or ‘satisfied so as to be sure’.

The move brings barristers in line with the rest of the legal profession and most other professions—the BSB and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons are currently the only professional regulators applying the criminal standard.

The BSB consulted on the move in 2017.

BSB director general, Dr Vanessa Davies, said: ‘This is an important moment in the ongoing modernisation of our regulatory arrangements. The public and the profession can continue to have confidence that our disciplinary proceedings are robust, thorough and fair to all concerned.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll