header-logo header-logo

05 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Bar Council calls for Royal Commission of criminal justice

The Bar Council has called for a ‘whole system review’ of criminal justice through a Royal Commission, in written evidence to the Public Accounts Committee’s inquiry into the backlog in the criminal courts

It warned a shortage of courts, judges, court staff and advocates is making it impossible to reduce the criminal cases backlog. There are currently more than 67,000 cases awaiting trial in the Crown Court, which makes the government’s target of 53,000 outstanding cases by March 2025 look precarious.

The bar set out the problems in the system at present and pinpointed nine areas for improvement. These were: early legal advice, early guilty pleas, prison transportation and interpretation services, remote hearings, judicial recruitment, community resolution, scheduling and listing, support for legal aid professionals, and targeted assistance for specific areas and court centres.

Its submission last week highlighted that judicial sitting days are at maximum levels, having reached 107,700 sitting days, and it may be difficult to find enough judges to hear the backlog of cases.

It states: ‘Between 2012-13 and 2021-22, the number of judges (full time employed) in England and Wales has fallen by 4% and the number of magistrates in the same period by 47%.

‘This is not simply a response to declining caseloads; judicial capacity has fallen more steeply than the number of cases in the respective courts in which they operate. Perhaps of even greater impact is the loss of advocates (particularly barristers) available to prosecute and defend the serious criminal cases that are heard in the Crown Court. Between 2019-20 and 2020-21 the number of barristers practising full-time in publicly funded criminal law declined by more than 10%.’

Bar Council chair Sam Townend KC (pictured) said: ‘Existing criminal justice policy is now at a dead end and substantial change and investment are needed to reduce the backlog.

‘The status quo has a detrimental impact on victims, attrition of witnesses, and innocent defendants are left for years languishing with the charges oppressively held over their heads. The guilty are not being dealt with and the public has lost confidence in a system that is just not working.’

Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll