header-logo header-logo

05 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Bar Council calls for Royal Commission of criminal justice

The Bar Council has called for a ‘whole system review’ of criminal justice through a Royal Commission, in written evidence to the Public Accounts Committee’s inquiry into the backlog in the criminal courts

It warned a shortage of courts, judges, court staff and advocates is making it impossible to reduce the criminal cases backlog. There are currently more than 67,000 cases awaiting trial in the Crown Court, which makes the government’s target of 53,000 outstanding cases by March 2025 look precarious.

The bar set out the problems in the system at present and pinpointed nine areas for improvement. These were: early legal advice, early guilty pleas, prison transportation and interpretation services, remote hearings, judicial recruitment, community resolution, scheduling and listing, support for legal aid professionals, and targeted assistance for specific areas and court centres.

Its submission last week highlighted that judicial sitting days are at maximum levels, having reached 107,700 sitting days, and it may be difficult to find enough judges to hear the backlog of cases.

It states: ‘Between 2012-13 and 2021-22, the number of judges (full time employed) in England and Wales has fallen by 4% and the number of magistrates in the same period by 47%.

‘This is not simply a response to declining caseloads; judicial capacity has fallen more steeply than the number of cases in the respective courts in which they operate. Perhaps of even greater impact is the loss of advocates (particularly barristers) available to prosecute and defend the serious criminal cases that are heard in the Crown Court. Between 2019-20 and 2020-21 the number of barristers practising full-time in publicly funded criminal law declined by more than 10%.’

Bar Council chair Sam Townend KC (pictured) said: ‘Existing criminal justice policy is now at a dead end and substantial change and investment are needed to reduce the backlog.

‘The status quo has a detrimental impact on victims, attrition of witnesses, and innocent defendants are left for years languishing with the charges oppressively held over their heads. The guilty are not being dealt with and the public has lost confidence in a system that is just not working.’

Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll