header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar complaints-handling system faces overhaul

Legal Services

The complaints-handling regime against barristers looks set for a major overhaul following the launch of a consultation on the process by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). Views are being sought on significant changes to the way complaints about barristers, and any subsequent disciplinary proceedings, are handled. These include the introduction of the concept of “improper behaviour” towards non-clients and a new process to speed the disposal of cases where the barrister is prepared to agree to the outcome of a complaint. Plans to extend the complaints commissioner’s powers, to allow him to make recommendations for the disposal of complaints that do not require disciplinary action, are also outlined.

The consultation, Complaints and Disciplinary Processes, follows the publication last July of a strategic review by complaints commissioner Rob Behrens, of the Bar’s complaints and disciplinary processes, in which he said the current system was in need of significant improvement and made 52 recommendations for change.

Ruth Evans, BSB chairman, says: “The proposals are designed to ensure that the complaints and disciplinary system is fair and effective.

The changes should improve the speed and efficiency of the system and, also, increase the confidence and satisfaction of consumers and barristers in the system.” The consultation paper can be downloaded at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll