header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / David Hislop
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Banking
printer mail-detail

Banks, SARS & the customer

Banks & customers are potential victims in an unhappy balance,
says David Hislop

Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2007 (POCA 2002) put banks between a rock and a hard place. The bank has no interest in acting contrary to the needs or interests of their customers upon who they rely for business. Doubtless they have every desire to meet their own contractual duties owed to their customers in the interests of good business. But Pt 7 of POCA 2002 clearly puts the bank between its customer and the legislature.

Even if a bank account did not contain funds which were criminal property and no offence had been committed by the customer, s 328(1) applied where the bank had a suspicion that it was involved in dealing with criminal property; the combined effect of ss 328(2), 335 and 338 is to force a third party in the bank’s position to report its suspicions to the relevant authorities and not to move suspect funds or property for the requisite time period; in the meantime, the bank is not allowed to make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll