header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Expenses

Appleyard v Wewelwala [2012] EWHC 3302 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 285 (Nov)

Chancery Division, Briggs J, 23 November 2012

The High Court may rely on its inherent jurisdiction to make provision for the payment of a trustee in bankruptcy’s expenses where the bankruptcy order has been successfully overturned on an appeal, on an application of which he was not notified, at a hearing he did not attended and by an order which made no provision for his release form office.

Louise Bowmaker (instructed by Ward Hadaway) for the trustee. The respondent appeared in person.

In April 2011, the respondent was made bankrupt on the petition of a creditor. In July 2011, a trustee in bankruptcy was appointed. The trustee began incurring expenses in discharging his duties. In October 2011, the respondent’s application for permission to appeal against the petition was adjourned and the creditor was directed to attend the adjourned hearing (the October order). The October order did not state that the appeal would immediately follow if permission was granted or that the respondent should notify the trustee of the adjourned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll