header-logo header-logo

29 July 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

To ban or not to ban?

Dominic Regan wades into the debate over referral fees

“I recommend that the payment of referral fees for personal injury claims be banned” (The final Jackson report, p 206). The payment of referral fees is “anti-competitive, a violation of privacy and a cartel against the consumer” (The Times, 27 June 2011).

During the 18 months between publication of these two statements a great deal happened and it appeared that referral fees would survive. It ain’t necessarily so.

I was told by a very senior civil servant in July 2010 that the new administration, while bent on drastic costs reform, was relaxed about referral fees. If solicitors wanted to spend their cash on buying work to do then let them.

Disappointment

May 2011 saw the publication of the Legal Services Board’s decision document on referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. I was not alone in finding the report a disappointment. One of the largest insurers in the country rang me up because they could see no logic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll