header-logo header-logo

29 July 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

To ban or not to ban?

Dominic Regan wades into the debate over referral fees

“I recommend that the payment of referral fees for personal injury claims be banned” (The final Jackson report, p 206). The payment of referral fees is “anti-competitive, a violation of privacy and a cartel against the consumer” (The Times, 27 June 2011).

During the 18 months between publication of these two statements a great deal happened and it appeared that referral fees would survive. It ain’t necessarily so.

I was told by a very senior civil servant in July 2010 that the new administration, while bent on drastic costs reform, was relaxed about referral fees. If solicitors wanted to spend their cash on buying work to do then let them.

Disappointment

May 2011 saw the publication of the Legal Services Board’s decision document on referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. I was not alone in finding the report a disappointment. One of the largest insurers in the country rang me up because they could see no logic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll