header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / David Lock
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A balancing act

David Lock discusses the use and abuse of interim remedies in Administrative Court actions

Although judicial review applications are a special form of litigation, CPR 25 applies in the same way as it applies to other species of litigation and the full range of interim remedies is potentially available. However special considerations apply to the grant of interim injunctive relief where the dispute involves a conflict between private and public interests, especially where damages are not a primary remedy for either party.

Starting point for seeking interim relief

The House of Lords in Reg v Transport Sec, Ex p Factortame Ltd (No. 2) [1991] 1 AC 603 confirmed that the American Cyanamid approach was the starting point for interim relief in public law cases as it is in private law litigation.

Hence the first question is whether the claimant has raised a serious issue to be tried. There is a presumption of validity in the lawfulness of the actions of public bodies. It is for the claimant to displace the presumption. However if a claimant gets over the hurdle of showing that there is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll