header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012 / Karl Tonks
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A balanced approach?

Karl Tonks makes the case for independent legal advice in personal injury cases

Proposals to arbitrarily slash fees in the portal and the fast track will irrevocably damage access to justice for many genuine victims of injury. The fees which have been proposed do not reflect the work involved and only serve to cut independent legal advice from the system.

This is a worrying prospect for members of the public, as without proper legal advice, their access to justice will be severely restricted, if not denied altogether. The government has not made its case for why the fees should be cut and is only proposing to do so because insurers have said they should be cut.

The consultation is proceeding on a false premise that the incoming ban on referral fees will result in a saving from the fixed fee. But referral fees were never included in the original fee negotiations and many firms do not even pay them.

Shared concerns

Our concerns about the proposed fees are not just shared by other claimant lawyers. Only recently, Professor Paul Fenn, the independent academic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll