Nicholas Bevan suspects an unconstitutional influence from insurers in the motor insurance sector
In June this year the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 1999 was subjected to judicial scrutiny and found wanting ((see Second Sight article on Delaney v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] EWHC 1785 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 31 (Jun)). The Department for Transport (DfT) was exposed for introducing an exclusion of liability clause that flouted the minimum standards of compensatory protection required under the European motor insurance directives and it was ordered to recompense a seriously injured passenger whom the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) had refused to compensate.
One of the most notable features of this case was the DfT’s apparently insouciant disregard of Community law. Its officials were unable, or unwilling, to explain why it had authorised a clause that even in 1999 amounted to a clear and obvious breach of the minimum standards of compensatory protection imposed under the Motor Insurance Directives.
The motor insurance sector is a highly profitable multibillion pound industry. It operates in an artificial market funded through the insurance premiums that its customers are obliged
