header-logo header-logo

Backlog report highlights shocking impacts of Crown Court delays

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) appears to have ‘simply accepted’ Crown Court backlogs will continue to grow rather than taking the urgent action required, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has warned.

In a devastating report this week, PAC—one of Parliament’s most influential committees—highlighted the impact of the delays and urged the government to act now rather than waiting for Sir Brian Leveson’s independent review of the criminal courts to report in the autumn.

PAC’s chair, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, said it was ‘disappointing’ the backlog is at a record high of 73,000, compared to a record low of 33,290 in March 2019 pre-COVID.

‘Victims of rape and serious sexual offences (RASSO) can wait for three years or more for these cases to come to trial,’ he said. ‘In 2024, 59% of victims of adult rape dropped out of the justice system because research shows they could not bear the trauma any longer.

‘The remand population has almost doubled from 9,602 in 2018 to 17,600 in September 2024 (20% of the entire prison population). 770 prisoners have been on remand for over two years. These are shocking statistics involving sometimes innocent people which should be carefully scrutinised to see how the system could be improved’.

The report, ‘Crown Court backlogs’, noted more than a third (35%) of prisoners on remand in 2022 did not ultimately receive a custodial sentence, including 13% who were acquitted entirely. It urged the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice to look for ways to reduce remand numbers to 2019 levels, freeing up 8,000 prison places.

It recommended the MoJ and judiciary try to reduce the number of on-the-day postponements of hearings in serious sexual and violent cases, which are highly distressing for victims, and to protect funding for victim support services.

It also expressed concern that one in four trials fail to take place on their scheduled date (ineffective trials) compared to about 15% of trials pre-pandemic. It noted some of these delays would be ‘straightforward to resolve’: for example, building maintenance issues, poor case preparation, or where remand prisoners arrive late at court.

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll