header-logo header-logo

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Backlog report highlights shocking impacts of Crown Court delays

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) appears to have ‘simply accepted’ Crown Court backlogs will continue to grow rather than taking the urgent action required, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has warned.

In a devastating report this week, PAC—one of Parliament’s most influential committees—highlighted the impact of the delays and urged the government to act now rather than waiting for Sir Brian Leveson’s independent review of the criminal courts to report in the autumn.

PAC’s chair, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, said it was ‘disappointing’ the backlog is at a record high of 73,000, compared to a record low of 33,290 in March 2019 pre-COVID.

‘Victims of rape and serious sexual offences (RASSO) can wait for three years or more for these cases to come to trial,’ he said. ‘In 2024, 59% of victims of adult rape dropped out of the justice system because research shows they could not bear the trauma any longer.

‘The remand population has almost doubled from 9,602 in 2018 to 17,600 in September 2024 (20% of the entire prison population). 770 prisoners have been on remand for over two years. These are shocking statistics involving sometimes innocent people which should be carefully scrutinised to see how the system could be improved’.

The report, ‘Crown Court backlogs’, noted more than a third (35%) of prisoners on remand in 2022 did not ultimately receive a custodial sentence, including 13% who were acquitted entirely. It urged the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice to look for ways to reduce remand numbers to 2019 levels, freeing up 8,000 prison places.

It recommended the MoJ and judiciary try to reduce the number of on-the-day postponements of hearings in serious sexual and violent cases, which are highly distressing for victims, and to protect funding for victim support services.

It also expressed concern that one in four trials fail to take place on their scheduled date (ineffective trials) compared to about 15% of trials pre-pandemic. It noted some of these delays would be ‘straightforward to resolve’: for example, building maintenance issues, poor case preparation, or where remand prisoners arrive late at court.

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll