header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 October 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Back to the future

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
web_comment_0

Roger Smith embarks on some legal time-travel

In the month that includes “Back to the Future Day”, October 21, we should look at how legal practice is developing. We might remind ourselves that, whatever lawyers—particularly legal aid practitioners—were saying in October 1985, actually they had never had it so good. The duty solicitor scheme was about to be expanded: expenditure was on the up and set for a record climb through the next decade. The future is going to be so different.

Legal aid: here

Conferences in Birmingham (organised by the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG)) and Belfast (the Public Interest Litigation Support project) discussed the future for legal aid practitioners. Both were pretty bleak. In particular, the LAPG delegates knew they were under the cosh. The good news was that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) had sent representatives for the first time: the bad news is what they said when they came. In truth, the Legal Aid Agency’s Hugh Barrett and Caroline Crowther had little option but to mouth their masters’ line that society benefitted from cuts that had reduced legal aid from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll