header-logo header-logo

06 February 2015 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Back to the future

Predicting the future: 2015 in commercial disputes, by Ian Gascoigne

A year ago, New Law Journal published an article in which a colleague and I speculated on the outlook for commercial litigation in 2014 (see “Opportunities & threats”, 164 NLJ 7594, p 6). Principally, we said that the courts’ grip on case management would tighten in the aftermath of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430, but damages-based agreements would turn out to be slow burners. Both predictions proved to be correct. Resisting the advice to “quit while ahead”, the challenge of foreshadowing what will occur in 2015 is not as easy. I see it as a year of consolidation after two years’ upheaval.

Subtle difference

The outlook for commercial claims in 2015 is subtly different from a year ago. Then, the much-feared Jackson reforms, in use for nine months, were creating a real stir among dispute lawyers. Although at the start of 2014 many commercial claims were excluded from the rigour of mandatory costs budgeting, the rule for requesting relief from sanctions (CPR 3.9)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll