header-logo header-logo

06 February 2015 / Ian Gascoigne
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Back to the future

Predicting the future: 2015 in commercial disputes, by Ian Gascoigne

A year ago, New Law Journal published an article in which a colleague and I speculated on the outlook for commercial litigation in 2014 (see “Opportunities & threats”, 164 NLJ 7594, p 6). Principally, we said that the courts’ grip on case management would tighten in the aftermath of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430, but damages-based agreements would turn out to be slow burners. Both predictions proved to be correct. Resisting the advice to “quit while ahead”, the challenge of foreshadowing what will occur in 2015 is not as easy. I see it as a year of consolidation after two years’ upheaval.

Subtle difference

The outlook for commercial claims in 2015 is subtly different from a year ago. Then, the much-feared Jackson reforms, in use for nine months, were creating a real stir among dispute lawyers. Although at the start of 2014 many commercial claims were excluded from the rigour of mandatory costs budgeting, the rule for requesting relief from sanctions (CPR 3.9)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll