header-logo header-logo

11 December 2013 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Back & forth

web_bryden_salter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter discuss some of the key developments of 2013 & share a few predictions...

With a nod towards the impending Winterval holiday period, this article rounds up some of the more interesting developments in the field of employment law throughout 2013, as well as forthcoming changes that employment practitioners can look forward to in 2014. There is no defining strand running through the matters highlighted other than they caught the eye of the authors.

 

New fees

The first matter in 2013, and probably that which cumulatively has affected employment practitioners the most is the introduction of fees for tribunal claims.

  • To lodge a claim in the employment tribunal a claimant must now either pay the fee or apply for a fee remission.
  • All claims made from 29 July 2013 fall within the fees regime.
  • In addition, a hearing fee is payable, and applications (such as for a review) also attract fees.
  • Cases are divided into type A and type B claims, with all but the most simple (such as Wage Act) claims falling into the latter category.
  • The
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll