header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bach’s big idea

Jon Robins welcomes Lord Bach’s proposal to put legal advice on a par with the right to free healthcare & education

There are many recommendations in the long-awaited report of the Bach Commission on Access to Justice published last week; but there is one big idea: ‘a new legally enforceable right to justice’. Coming after a number of post-LASPO (Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act) reports in recent months—ironically, the government’s own review of its legislation remains nowhere in sight—Lord Willy Bach and his fellow commissioners needed ‘a big idea’ to stand out from the crowd.

It is often said that legal aid is ‘a pillar of the welfare state’. If that’s true, our system of publicly-funded law has become so enfeebled that it is no longer load-bearing. The introduction of a right to justice is compelling because it re-establishes the connection between our system of legal aid to the principles upon which the welfare state was built.

The proportion of the population eligible for legal aid collapsed from eight out of 10 people in 1980 to less than one third of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll