header-logo header-logo

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Axiom Ince review lays blame on SRA

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has initiated enforcement action against the solicitors’ regulator over its handling of Axiom Ince Limited

Axiom Ince Limited closed in October 2023 with the loss of 1,400 jobs and approximately £60m client money missing. In November 2023, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) launched an investigation into the firm, arresting seven individuals in dawn raids across the South East of England.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell into the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) actions before it closed Axiom Ince has found the SRA ‘did not act adequately, effectively and efficiently’.

The review, published this week, concluded the SRA did not take all the steps it could or should have taken, and its ‘actions and omissions in this matter necessitate change in its procedures to mitigate the possibility of a similar situation arising again’.

Alan Kershaw, LSB chair, said: ‘The Axiom Ince case has caused significant consumer detriment.’

The LSB Board is now initiating the process to set directions under s 32 of the Legal Services Act 2007, requiring the SRA to make changes to better achieve its regulatory objectives.

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘At the heart of this issue is a suspected complex and well-hidden fraud carried out by a solicitor, with an ongoing criminal investigation by the SFO.

‘The report recognises our “excellent work” in uncovering the suspected fraud. But there are things we could have done better. We moved quickly last year to tighten up some of our processes.

‘There is a lot in the report that we don’t agree with, and we don’t understand the basis for enforcement action. We will be consulting soon on changes to better protect clients’ money. This will include exploring the more radical solution of whether we should stop law firms holding client money.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘While the events leading to Axiom’s collapse were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion rather than tackling the known risks from accumulator style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll