header-logo header-logo

Avoiding non-party costs

17 June 2010 / Helene Pines Richman
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Helene Pines Richman outlines the dangers of acting without insurance

Conditional fee agreements (CFAs) are now a regular feature of the cost landscape particularly in certain types of cases. Almost hand in hand, the rules relating to after the event (ATE) insurance have developed not only in respect of the duty of care owed to clients but also the effects inter partes. The Code of Conduct 2007, r 2.03(1)(g), of which solicitors will be aware, provides that a solicitor must discuss how a client will pay for litigation and whether his liability for another person’s costs may be covered by existing insurance or whether special insurance can be obtained. Solicitors, however, may be less cognisant of the current position in respect to their exposure under the wasted cost jurisdiction and/or third party funding rules (CPR Rules 48.7 and 48.2, respectively).

Early safeguards

Solicitors should raise the issue of ATE insurance and make sure the discussion is well documented, to safeguard any later defence to a negligence claim by a losing client facing a monstrous costs order.
The failure to raise the issue or the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll