header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Asylum seeker—Age—Determination

R (on the application of PM) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 28 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Hickinbottom J, 4 August 2010

A local authority charged with obligations to children under ss 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989 is not bound by a simple finding of fact by the First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (FTT) as to the age of an applicant for support.

Christopher Buttler (instructed by Steel & Shamash) for the claimant. Holly Stout (instructed by Kathryn Pettitt) for the defendant.

In April 2010, following a finding of the FTT in the course of an asylum appeal that the claimant was over 18 years old, the defendant local authority withdrew the accommodation and other support it had made available to the claimant as a child since November 2008. The claimant applied for judicial review of that withdrawal, contending that, in the absence of a proper and reasoned reassessment of the claimant’s age by the authority to withdraw the services, the authority was in breach of its statutory obligations to provide accommodation, support

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll