header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Asylum seeker—Age—Determination

R (on the application of PM) v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 2056 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 28 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, Hickinbottom J, 4 August 2010

A local authority charged with obligations to children under ss 17 and 20 of the Children Act 1989 is not bound by a simple finding of fact by the First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (FTT) as to the age of an applicant for support.

Christopher Buttler (instructed by Steel & Shamash) for the claimant. Holly Stout (instructed by Kathryn Pettitt) for the defendant.

In April 2010, following a finding of the FTT in the course of an asylum appeal that the claimant was over 18 years old, the defendant local authority withdrew the accommodation and other support it had made available to the claimant as a child since November 2008. The claimant applied for judicial review of that withdrawal, contending that, in the absence of a proper and reasoned reassessment of the claimant’s age by the authority to withdraw the services, the authority was in breach of its statutory obligations to provide accommodation, support

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll