header-logo header-logo

09 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Associates show loyalty, like money and don’t yearn to be partner

Partnership is no longer the driving ambition of the majority of solicitors, according to research by legal information provider LexisNexis Legal & Professional

Moreover, associates are both more loyal and more money-driven than law firm leaders assume.

Only one in four current associates want to make partner at their current firm in the next five years, and only 3% aspire to partnership at another firm, in a reversal of traditional law career goals.

This comes as no surprise to almost half of law firm leaders (rising to 63% of leaders at large law firms), who say they have noticed a decline in partnership ambitions among associates. Most of those leaders (71%) attributed the shift to a desire for a better work-life balance.

However, the report, ‘Disloyal lawyers: has the partnership model lost its lustre?’, published this week, also found associates have a strong sense of loyalty to their firm. More than half plan to be at the same firm in five years’ time, with only 12% planning to exit private practice for in-house roles, academia or other career opportunities. This contrasts with the perception of law firm leaders, 72% of whom believe associates are less loyal than previous generations. In fact, some 69% of large law firm leaders cite attracting and retaining talent as one of their biggest challenges.

So, what makes associates stay put? About seven in ten associates would be encouraged to stay by an offer of more money, whereas only 36% would stay for a better work-life balance.

Stuart Greenhill, senior director of segment strategy at LexisNexis, said: ‘The current generation of workers are disruptors, not conformers.

‘If they see something they don't like, they'll push back. To meet growth goals and retain a feasible talent pipeline, law firms will need to find a middle-ground. They cannot rely on what has worked well in the past, especially with the AI revolution well on its way.’

The report, which is based on a survey of more than 500 associates and senior leaders, can be viewed here

Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll